chi-square test with yates continuity correction Search Results


chi-square test with yates correction  (CH Instruments)
90
CH Instruments chi-square test with yates correction
Chi Square Test With Yates Correction, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chi-square+test+with+yates+continuity+correction/chi+square+test+with+yates+correction/pmc03136013-67-14-11
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chi-square test with yates correction - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
chi-square test with yates’ continuity correction for 2 × 2 tables (sex)  (CH Instruments)
90
CH Instruments chi-square test with yates’ continuity correction for 2 × 2 tables (sex)
Chi Square Test With Yates’ Continuity Correction For 2 × 2 Tables (Sex), supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chi-square+test+with+yates+continuity+correction/chi+square+test+criterion+with+yates%E2%80%99+correction+for+2+x+2+contingency+tables/pmc10579280__mmc1-242-40-36
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chi-square test with yates’ continuity correction for 2 × 2 tables (sex) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
chi-squared test with yates's correction or two-tailed fisher test  (CH Instruments)
90
CH Instruments chi-squared test with yates's correction or two-tailed fisher test
Chi Squared Test With Yates's Correction Or Two Tailed Fisher Test, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chi-square+test+with+yates+continuity+correction/yates+corrected+chi+square+or+two+sided+exact+fisher+test/pmc06326924-110-25-18
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chi-squared test with yates's correction or two-tailed fisher test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
yates-corrected chi-square test in r studio version 2022  (RStudio)
90
RStudio yates-corrected chi-square test in r studio version 2022
Yates Corrected Chi Square Test In R Studio Version 2022, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chi-square+test+with+yates+continuity+correction/yates+corrected+chi+square+test+in+r+studio+version+2022/pmc11355564-105-6-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
yates-corrected chi-square test in r studio version 2022 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
mcnemar test with yates’s correction  (CH Instruments)
90
CH Instruments mcnemar test with yates’s correction
( A, B ) Perfusion of yohimbine solution (50 µM in physiological saline) into honey bee head capsule caused antennal lobe units to decrease response magnitude to odor stimuli (2-octanone and 1-hexanol) in general. Odor was delivered through a solenoid valve that was open at time zero and lasted for 4 s. ( C ) In control experiments where yohimbine was not applied, most of the units were responsive to both hexanol and octanone, but 39% were biased toward octanone (purple dots above the diagonal line), that is showing stronger response to octanone than to hexanol. During the familiarization protocol, these units were familiarized to hexanol 40 times with 1-min interval (arrow down) and were tested again with hexanol and octanone 10 min after the last odor stimulation in the familiarization phase. The test results show 54% of units responded more strongly to octanone (orange dots), which is a novel odor in this protocol. The 15% increase is statistically significant ( McNemar test with <t>Yates’s</t> correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 5.939, p < 0.02) (asterisks on purple and orange bars, N = 99). ( D ) When the familiarization protocol was used with saline versus yohimbine perfusion, the response bias toward novel odor was disrupted, showing a significant decrease in comparison with the familiar odor ( McNemar test with Yates’s correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 11.13, p < 0.001) (asterisks on gray bars, N = 56).
Mcnemar Test With Yates’s Correction, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chi-square+test+with+yates+continuity+correction/mcnemar+chi+squared+test+with+yates%E2%80%99s+correction/pmc10564449-135-23-28
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mcnemar test with yates’s correction - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
chi-square test with yates correction  (MedCalc Software Ltd)
90
MedCalc Software Ltd chi-square test with yates correction
( A, B ) Perfusion of yohimbine solution (50 µM in physiological saline) into honey bee head capsule caused antennal lobe units to decrease response magnitude to odor stimuli (2-octanone and 1-hexanol) in general. Odor was delivered through a solenoid valve that was open at time zero and lasted for 4 s. ( C ) In control experiments where yohimbine was not applied, most of the units were responsive to both hexanol and octanone, but 39% were biased toward octanone (purple dots above the diagonal line), that is showing stronger response to octanone than to hexanol. During the familiarization protocol, these units were familiarized to hexanol 40 times with 1-min interval (arrow down) and were tested again with hexanol and octanone 10 min after the last odor stimulation in the familiarization phase. The test results show 54% of units responded more strongly to octanone (orange dots), which is a novel odor in this protocol. The 15% increase is statistically significant ( McNemar test with <t>Yates’s</t> correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 5.939, p < 0.02) (asterisks on purple and orange bars, N = 99). ( D ) When the familiarization protocol was used with saline versus yohimbine perfusion, the response bias toward novel odor was disrupted, showing a significant decrease in comparison with the familiar odor ( McNemar test with Yates’s correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 11.13, p < 0.001) (asterisks on gray bars, N = 56).
Chi Square Test With Yates Correction, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chi-square+test+with+yates+continuity+correction/chi+square+test+with+yates+correction/pmc07382715-59-15-17
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chi-square test with yates correction - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
chi-square 2 × 2 test of independence with yates' correction  (CH Instruments)
90
CH Instruments chi-square 2 × 2 test of independence with yates' correction
( A, B ) Perfusion of yohimbine solution (50 µM in physiological saline) into honey bee head capsule caused antennal lobe units to decrease response magnitude to odor stimuli (2-octanone and 1-hexanol) in general. Odor was delivered through a solenoid valve that was open at time zero and lasted for 4 s. ( C ) In control experiments where yohimbine was not applied, most of the units were responsive to both hexanol and octanone, but 39% were biased toward octanone (purple dots above the diagonal line), that is showing stronger response to octanone than to hexanol. During the familiarization protocol, these units were familiarized to hexanol 40 times with 1-min interval (arrow down) and were tested again with hexanol and octanone 10 min after the last odor stimulation in the familiarization phase. The test results show 54% of units responded more strongly to octanone (orange dots), which is a novel odor in this protocol. The 15% increase is statistically significant ( McNemar test with <t>Yates’s</t> correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 5.939, p < 0.02) (asterisks on purple and orange bars, N = 99). ( D ) When the familiarization protocol was used with saline versus yohimbine perfusion, the response bias toward novel odor was disrupted, showing a significant decrease in comparison with the familiar odor ( McNemar test with Yates’s correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 11.13, p < 0.001) (asterisks on gray bars, N = 56).
Chi Square 2 × 2 Test Of Independence With Yates' Correction, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chi-square+test+with+yates+continuity+correction/chi+square+2+%C3%97+2+test+of+independence+with+yates++correction/pmc07807059-192-4-9
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chi-square 2 × 2 test of independence with yates' correction - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
chi-squared test with yates’ correction medcalc version 10.4.8  (MedCalc Software Ltd)
90
MedCalc Software Ltd chi-squared test with yates’ correction medcalc version 10.4.8
( A, B ) Perfusion of yohimbine solution (50 µM in physiological saline) into honey bee head capsule caused antennal lobe units to decrease response magnitude to odor stimuli (2-octanone and 1-hexanol) in general. Odor was delivered through a solenoid valve that was open at time zero and lasted for 4 s. ( C ) In control experiments where yohimbine was not applied, most of the units were responsive to both hexanol and octanone, but 39% were biased toward octanone (purple dots above the diagonal line), that is showing stronger response to octanone than to hexanol. During the familiarization protocol, these units were familiarized to hexanol 40 times with 1-min interval (arrow down) and were tested again with hexanol and octanone 10 min after the last odor stimulation in the familiarization phase. The test results show 54% of units responded more strongly to octanone (orange dots), which is a novel odor in this protocol. The 15% increase is statistically significant ( McNemar test with <t>Yates’s</t> correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 5.939, p < 0.02) (asterisks on purple and orange bars, N = 99). ( D ) When the familiarization protocol was used with saline versus yohimbine perfusion, the response bias toward novel odor was disrupted, showing a significant decrease in comparison with the familiar odor ( McNemar test with Yates’s correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 11.13, p < 0.001) (asterisks on gray bars, N = 56).
Chi Squared Test With Yates’ Correction Medcalc Version 10.4.8, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chi-square+test+with+yates+continuity+correction/chi+squared+test+with+yates%E2%80%99+correction+medcalc+version+10+4+8/pm24000038-56-19-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chi-squared test with yates’ correction medcalc version 10.4.8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
yates corrected chi-square test for 2x2 tables  (CH Instruments)
90
CH Instruments yates corrected chi-square test for 2x2 tables
( A, B ) Perfusion of yohimbine solution (50 µM in physiological saline) into honey bee head capsule caused antennal lobe units to decrease response magnitude to odor stimuli (2-octanone and 1-hexanol) in general. Odor was delivered through a solenoid valve that was open at time zero and lasted for 4 s. ( C ) In control experiments where yohimbine was not applied, most of the units were responsive to both hexanol and octanone, but 39% were biased toward octanone (purple dots above the diagonal line), that is showing stronger response to octanone than to hexanol. During the familiarization protocol, these units were familiarized to hexanol 40 times with 1-min interval (arrow down) and were tested again with hexanol and octanone 10 min after the last odor stimulation in the familiarization phase. The test results show 54% of units responded more strongly to octanone (orange dots), which is a novel odor in this protocol. The 15% increase is statistically significant ( McNemar test with <t>Yates’s</t> correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 5.939, p < 0.02) (asterisks on purple and orange bars, N = 99). ( D ) When the familiarization protocol was used with saline versus yohimbine perfusion, the response bias toward novel odor was disrupted, showing a significant decrease in comparison with the familiar odor ( McNemar test with Yates’s correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 11.13, p < 0.001) (asterisks on gray bars, N = 56).
Yates Corrected Chi Square Test For 2x2 Tables, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chi-square+test+with+yates+continuity+correction/yates+corrected+chi+square+test+for+2x2+tables/pm23106631-73-27-29
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
yates corrected chi-square test for 2x2 tables - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
chi-square test with yates correction for continuity  (MedCalc Software Ltd)
90
MedCalc Software Ltd chi-square test with yates correction for continuity
( A, B ) Perfusion of yohimbine solution (50 µM in physiological saline) into honey bee head capsule caused antennal lobe units to decrease response magnitude to odor stimuli (2-octanone and 1-hexanol) in general. Odor was delivered through a solenoid valve that was open at time zero and lasted for 4 s. ( C ) In control experiments where yohimbine was not applied, most of the units were responsive to both hexanol and octanone, but 39% were biased toward octanone (purple dots above the diagonal line), that is showing stronger response to octanone than to hexanol. During the familiarization protocol, these units were familiarized to hexanol 40 times with 1-min interval (arrow down) and were tested again with hexanol and octanone 10 min after the last odor stimulation in the familiarization phase. The test results show 54% of units responded more strongly to octanone (orange dots), which is a novel odor in this protocol. The 15% increase is statistically significant ( McNemar test with <t>Yates’s</t> correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 5.939, p < 0.02) (asterisks on purple and orange bars, N = 99). ( D ) When the familiarization protocol was used with saline versus yohimbine perfusion, the response bias toward novel odor was disrupted, showing a significant decrease in comparison with the familiar odor ( McNemar test with Yates’s correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 11.13, p < 0.001) (asterisks on gray bars, N = 56).
Chi Square Test With Yates Correction For Continuity, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chi-square+test+with+yates+continuity+correction/chi+square+test+with+yates+correction+for+continuity/10__1097_slash_iae__0b013e318285cb71-52-14-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chi-square test with yates correction for continuity - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
mantel– haensel chi-square test with yates correction or fisher exact  (CH Instruments)
90
CH Instruments mantel– haensel chi-square test with yates correction or fisher exact
( A, B ) Perfusion of yohimbine solution (50 µM in physiological saline) into honey bee head capsule caused antennal lobe units to decrease response magnitude to odor stimuli (2-octanone and 1-hexanol) in general. Odor was delivered through a solenoid valve that was open at time zero and lasted for 4 s. ( C ) In control experiments where yohimbine was not applied, most of the units were responsive to both hexanol and octanone, but 39% were biased toward octanone (purple dots above the diagonal line), that is showing stronger response to octanone than to hexanol. During the familiarization protocol, these units were familiarized to hexanol 40 times with 1-min interval (arrow down) and were tested again with hexanol and octanone 10 min after the last odor stimulation in the familiarization phase. The test results show 54% of units responded more strongly to octanone (orange dots), which is a novel odor in this protocol. The 15% increase is statistically significant ( McNemar test with <t>Yates’s</t> correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 5.939, p < 0.02) (asterisks on purple and orange bars, N = 99). ( D ) When the familiarization protocol was used with saline versus yohimbine perfusion, the response bias toward novel odor was disrupted, showing a significant decrease in comparison with the familiar odor ( McNemar test with Yates’s correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 11.13, p < 0.001) (asterisks on gray bars, N = 56).
Mantel– Haensel Chi Square Test With Yates Correction Or Fisher Exact, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chi-square+test+with+yates+continuity+correction/mantel++haensel+chi+square+test+with+yates+correction+or+fisher+exact/pm15855069-49-11-8
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mantel– haensel chi-square test with yates correction or fisher exact - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
chisquare test with yates correction  (MedCalc Software Ltd)
90
MedCalc Software Ltd chisquare test with yates correction
( A, B ) Perfusion of yohimbine solution (50 µM in physiological saline) into honey bee head capsule caused antennal lobe units to decrease response magnitude to odor stimuli (2-octanone and 1-hexanol) in general. Odor was delivered through a solenoid valve that was open at time zero and lasted for 4 s. ( C ) In control experiments where yohimbine was not applied, most of the units were responsive to both hexanol and octanone, but 39% were biased toward octanone (purple dots above the diagonal line), that is showing stronger response to octanone than to hexanol. During the familiarization protocol, these units were familiarized to hexanol 40 times with 1-min interval (arrow down) and were tested again with hexanol and octanone 10 min after the last odor stimulation in the familiarization phase. The test results show 54% of units responded more strongly to octanone (orange dots), which is a novel odor in this protocol. The 15% increase is statistically significant ( McNemar test with <t>Yates’s</t> correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 5.939, p < 0.02) (asterisks on purple and orange bars, N = 99). ( D ) When the familiarization protocol was used with saline versus yohimbine perfusion, the response bias toward novel odor was disrupted, showing a significant decrease in comparison with the familiar odor ( McNemar test with Yates’s correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 11.13, p < 0.001) (asterisks on gray bars, N = 56).
Chisquare Test With Yates Correction, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chi-square+test+with+yates+continuity+correction/chisquare+test+with+yates+correction/pm26463636-68-4-9
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chisquare test with yates correction - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A, B ) Perfusion of yohimbine solution (50 µM in physiological saline) into honey bee head capsule caused antennal lobe units to decrease response magnitude to odor stimuli (2-octanone and 1-hexanol) in general. Odor was delivered through a solenoid valve that was open at time zero and lasted for 4 s. ( C ) In control experiments where yohimbine was not applied, most of the units were responsive to both hexanol and octanone, but 39% were biased toward octanone (purple dots above the diagonal line), that is showing stronger response to octanone than to hexanol. During the familiarization protocol, these units were familiarized to hexanol 40 times with 1-min interval (arrow down) and were tested again with hexanol and octanone 10 min after the last odor stimulation in the familiarization phase. The test results show 54% of units responded more strongly to octanone (orange dots), which is a novel odor in this protocol. The 15% increase is statistically significant ( McNemar test with Yates’s correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 5.939, p < 0.02) (asterisks on purple and orange bars, N = 99). ( D ) When the familiarization protocol was used with saline versus yohimbine perfusion, the response bias toward novel odor was disrupted, showing a significant decrease in comparison with the familiar odor ( McNemar test with Yates’s correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 11.13, p < 0.001) (asterisks on gray bars, N = 56).

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Tyramine and its Amtyr1 receptor modulate attention in honey bees ( Apis mellifera )

doi: 10.7554/eLife.83348

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A, B ) Perfusion of yohimbine solution (50 µM in physiological saline) into honey bee head capsule caused antennal lobe units to decrease response magnitude to odor stimuli (2-octanone and 1-hexanol) in general. Odor was delivered through a solenoid valve that was open at time zero and lasted for 4 s. ( C ) In control experiments where yohimbine was not applied, most of the units were responsive to both hexanol and octanone, but 39% were biased toward octanone (purple dots above the diagonal line), that is showing stronger response to octanone than to hexanol. During the familiarization protocol, these units were familiarized to hexanol 40 times with 1-min interval (arrow down) and were tested again with hexanol and octanone 10 min after the last odor stimulation in the familiarization phase. The test results show 54% of units responded more strongly to octanone (orange dots), which is a novel odor in this protocol. The 15% increase is statistically significant ( McNemar test with Yates’s correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 5.939, p < 0.02) (asterisks on purple and orange bars, N = 99). ( D ) When the familiarization protocol was used with saline versus yohimbine perfusion, the response bias toward novel odor was disrupted, showing a significant decrease in comparison with the familiar odor ( McNemar test with Yates’s correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 11.13, p < 0.001) (asterisks on gray bars, N = 56).

Article Snippet: After familiarization, this percentage increased significantly to 54% ( , orange dots in lower panel; orange bar in ) ( McNemar test with Yates’s correction, df = 1, Chi-square = 5.939, p < 0.02).

Techniques: Saline, Control, Comparison